Security Code Review Best Practices: A Developer's Guide

Security shouldn't just be the "Security Team's" job. It needs to be part of the culture. When you're reviewing a peer's code, you are the first line of defense against data breaches.

Here is a developer-focused guide to security in code reviews.

1. Input Validation: The Golden Rule

Never trust data coming from the user. Look for:

▹Lack of sanitization on strings before they are used in HTML (XSS).
▹Direct use of variables in SQL queries (SQL Injection).
▹Files being saved using user-provided filenames (Path Traversal).

2. Authentication & Authorization

Just because a user is "logged in" doesn't mean they should see everything.

▹Check for: GET /api/orders/123. Does the code verify that order 123 actually belongs to the user making the request? (IDOR - Insecure Direct Object Reference).

3. Sensitive Data Exposure

Secrets are like zombies; once they get into your git history, they are very hard to kill.

▹Watch for: Hardcoded API keys, database passwords, or environment variables being committed.
▹Check logs: Are we accidentally logging passwords, credit card numbers, or PII?

4. Dependency Vulnerabilities

Security isn't just in the code you write; it's in the code you import.

▹Best Practice: Ensure package-lock.json or Cargo.lock updates are accompanied by a vulnerability scan (like npm audit or snyk).

5. Error Handling & Information Leakage

▹The Risk: Detailed stack traces in production can reveal database versions, server paths, and internal logic to attackers.
▹The Fix: Ensure errors are caught and replaced with generic messages for the user, while logging the details internally.

How Mesrai Protects You

Mesrai's multi-agent system includes a dedicated Security Agent. It uses semantic analysis to track data flow (Taint Analysis) and alerts you if unvalidated user input reaches a sensitive "sink" like a database or an API call.

Secure your codebase with Mesrai